Journalists write easier to read copy than PRs
Media Orchard has a fun little experiment to assess some media, marketing and PR blogs for their readability using the Gunning-Fog test. I thought I'd add a few extra to the pot (one or two duplicates) and see how PRs compare to journalists and politicians.
Basically it measures what age/how many years of education you need to have had in order to be able to understand the copy. So a newspaper like The Guardian or The Times would score 10 and The Sun scores 6 (which interestingly according to Wikipedia is what a typical comic scores).
The one that impressed me was David Miliband who started his government blog as a way "to help bridge the gap - the growing and potentially dangerous gap - between politicians and the public". From this score (a crude test I know) it looks like he is doing a good job.
I'll leave it to those of you featured to comment on the other results.
PR Voice (Tony Bradley) 11.77 - CIPR president and PR consultant
Mediations (Philip Young) 11.45 - PR academic
Boris Johnson MP, Shadow Minister for Higher Education 10.78 - Politician
Desirable Roasted Coffee (Allan Jenkins) 10.24 - PR consultant
AccMan Pro (Dennis Howlett) 10.19 - Journalist (ex, but also an accountant)
A PR Guru's Musings (Stuart Bruce) 10.07 - PR consultant
Neville Hobson 10.03 - PR consultant
The Business Editors (Caspian Publishing) 9.67 - Journalists (team blog)
A Shel of My Former Self (Shel Holtz) 9.57 - PR consultant
PR Squared (Todd Defren) 9.55 - PR consultant
Simonsays (Simon Collister) 9.42 - PR consultant
BusinessMatters (Stuart Jones) 9.36 - Accountant
PR Studies (Richard Bailey) 9.25 - PR academic
Guy Clapperton 9.20 - Journalist (freelance)
PR Blogger (Stephen Davies) 9.07 - PR student
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (David Miliband) 8.84 - Politician
Teblog (David Tebbutt) 8.59 - Journalist (freelance)
Charles on.... anything that comes along (Charles Arthur) 7.94 - Journalist (Technology Guardian editor)
ITWEEKBLOG (Gary Flood) 7.29 - Journalist
PR Opinions (Tom Murphy) 7.14 - PR in-house


When I started in journalism (1979), I was told to write for 9-year olds. I'm happy with my ranking. Thank you.
Posted by: David Tebbutt | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 17:39
Of course, one has to consider the ontological and epistymological background of the person putting electronic pen to (metaphorically speaking that is) paper to properly assess whether the assessment is correct, or for that matter relevant, to the listening or as in this medium, reading audience in the first place.
At least I'm not as dense as Boris Johnson.
Posted by: Dennis Howlett | Friday, May 26, 2006 at 18:43
My blog (http://manojranaweera.blogspot.com/) scored 12.64
Corporate website (http://www.ebdex.co.uk) scored 13.70
I use simple words - yet score is too high.
Posted by: Manoj Ranaweera | Saturday, May 27, 2006 at 00:58
So I'm dumb for an academic. But not smart enough to be a tabloid journalist...
Posted by: Richard Bailey | Wednesday, May 31, 2006 at 11:03
Thanks a lot, Stuart! I was hoping I still wrote like a journalist but as my latest post was about discussing semiotics in Romania I suppose I deserve it...
Posted by: Philip Young | Thursday, June 01, 2006 at 10:13